Republic of Moldova: Technical Assistance Report-Design Considerations for a New Bank Liquidation Framework

Republic of Moldova: Technical Assistance Report-Design Considerations for a New Bank Liquidation Framework
READ MORE...
Volume/Issue: Volume 2024 Issue 055
Publication date:
ISBN:
Add to Cart by clicking price of the language and format you'd like to purchase
Available Languages and Formats
Topics covered in this book

This title contains information about the following subjects. Click on a subject if you would like to see other titles with the same subjects.

Banks and Banking , Finance , Republic of Moldova , Bank Liquidation , Bank Failures , Purchase and Assumption , Depositors , Financial Stability , , bank liquidation model , Moldovan bank liquidation regime , NBM staff , NBM Law , liquidation framework , Financial sector stability , Bank resolution framework , Bank resolution , Banking crises

Summary

At the request of the National Bank of Moldova (NBM), a technical assistance (TA) mission of the Monetary and Capital Markets Department and the Legal Department visited Chisinau during November 28 to December 5, 2022, to assist with the design of a revised bank liquidation framework. The mission reviewed three stylized models for bank liquidation – i.e., a purely administrative model in which a public authority (e.g., the resolution authority) directs the liquidation procedure, a judicial model that relies on court-supervised liquidation procedures, and a hybrid model in which a dedicated liquidator carries out the liquidation process under supervision of the court. It identified important considerations in support of a continued (albeit reduced) role for the NBM in bank liquidation and concluded that a hybrid model could be a viable option for Moldova: by shifting more responsibilities to the judiciary, the NBM’s Resolution Division could free up some resources, while maintaining synergies between the NBM’s responsibilities for adopting early intervention measures and (the planning of) bank liquidation. The mission recommended that, in such a model, the NBM retains the power to (i) initiate liquidation; (ii) appoint or propose liquidators; and (iii) undertake a ‘Purchase and Assumption’ type of transaction, whereby the deposits of the failing bank are transferred to a willing buyer. It also provided detailed guidance on, among others, (i) the triggers for determining when liquidation should be initiated; (ii) the process for commencing the liquidation process; (iii) the legislative design of transfer powers and associated safeguards; (iv) the role and appointment of liquidators; and (v) legal protection of the NBM.