Repo Rate Dynamics: The Role of Dealers, Hedge Funds, and Issuance

Stablecoins and Fragility in Fixed Exchange Rate Regimes
READ MORE...
Volume/Issue: Volume 2026 Issue 144
Publication date: July 2026
ISBN: 9798229053778
$0.00
Add to Cart by clicking price of the language and format you'd like to purchase
Available Languages and Formats
PDF
ePub
English
Topics covered in this book

This title contains information about the following subjects. Click on a subject if you would like to see other titles with the same subjects.

Banks and Banking , Finance , Investments and Securities-General , stablecoins , fixed exchange rates , parallel foreign-exchange markets , Currencies , Exchange rates , Hedging , Exchange rate arrangements

Summary

This paper studies how dollar stablecoins affect parallel foreign-exchange markets in economies with fixed or heavily managed exchange rates. When foreign currency is rationed, the true degree of exchange-rate misalignment is not directly observed. Traditional parallel markets reveal it only imperfectly because information is dispersed across bilateral and often private trading opportunities. Stablecoins make dollar-like claims easier to access outside the official allocation system, but they also create a visible, high-frequency price that aggregates order flow in a common venue. I develop a global-games model in which households observe dispersed private signals about misalignment, while stablecoin market depth determines the precision of a common public signal. Stablecoins generate a state-dependent welfare effect. They expand access to foreign-currency and can improve allocation by making beliefs about misalignment more informative, but the same public price can also coordinate runs by making beliefs and actions more synchronized. When misalignment is low, access and allocation gains dominate, so stablecoins raise welfare. When misalignment is high, the coordination externality becomes more costly: a more precise public signal compresses belief dispersion, strengthens coordinated exit incentives, and can overturn the access benefit. This points to a state-contingent approach that preserves low-cost access in normal states while using temporary, targeted measures to manage large or run-like flows when misalignment is high.